2011 TONGA COURT REPORT 

 

 

B.      STRUCTURE OF THE COURTS

 

 

 

2.  REPORT OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS

 

2.1     Introduction

This report is for the year beginning 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2011.  It covers the work of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the Land Court.  

 

2.2     Court of Appeal of Tonga

The President of the Court of Appeal is the Lord Chief Justice.  The other members of the Court in 2011 were Hon. Mr. Justice James Burchett, Hon. Mr. Justice Peter Salmon and Hon. Mr. Justice Michael Moore. 

For the first time the Court of Appeal sat in two separate sessions in the reporting year.  Government had introduced the second session to reduce waiting time for parties and reduce pressure on the Court.  The first session was in April (1 week) and the second session was in September (2 weeks).  

The core support staff for the Appeal session was fewer in numbers but transcription work required all officers from the Translation Unit to assist.  A major difficulty facing the Court is the want of properly functioning recording equipment which is required for transcription. 

The following table is a breakdown of the cases that were decided by the Court of Appeal in its 2011 sessions:

 

 

 

 

YEAR

Total Filings

CASES DISPOSED OF

PENDING

DISPOSAL RATE IN (%)

2011

23

20

3

86%

 

2.3     Supreme Court

The Lord Chief Justice presides over the Supreme Court which, in 2011 had only one other member, Hon Mr. Justice Robert Shuster.  One position of Puisne Judge was vacant throughout 2011.  

Beginning in 2011 the division of work was reviewed whereby the Chief Justice assumed primary responsibility for the Civil, Appellate and Family jurisdictions while Hon Justice Shuster predominantly dealt with Criminal matters.  There were a few cases transferred across this division for one reason or another but overall cases were assigned according to jurisdiction.  Registrars were as a result dealing in a particular jurisdiction rather than a particular Court.  

The volume of work in the Supreme Court shows an increase in the Criminal jurisdiction but a marked fall in the new cases filed in the Civil jurisdiction in 2011.  At the end of the reporting year there were 137 criminal cases pending although 298 cases of total pending cases for the year were disposed of.   

In the Family (Divorce) jurisdiction there was a slight increase in new cases filed for 2011 but with relatively less dealt with.  For other family matters (Adoption and Legal Guardianship) there were 143 matters filed compared to 134 from the previous year.  A total of 81 cases from pending cases were finalized with 61 remaining from 2011. 

New appeals from Magistrates Court remained at about the same level for the reporting year.  There was focus on improved rate of disposal for these matters which is reflected in outcome for 2011 when there were only two Criminal appeals outstanding by end of 2011, however, Civil appeals were comparable to previous year’s performance.  The standard of appeal papers needs to be improved to allow appeals to be disposed of more expeditiously.  

The major cause of delay in disposing of the Supreme Court business is want of prosecution of cases commenced. Short of adopting a strict time-based case management system the Court is only able to hear and dispose of those matters which are brought to readiness for trial by the parties’ lawyer.  Where actions are ready for trial a date for the trial can usually be made available within 2 months. 

The Court Dates List for 2011 set out amongst other things the timetable for Circuits to the outer-islands.  Circuits to Vava’u proceeded as scheduled with 3 weeks sessions in May and October 2011.  There was no Circuit to the rest of the island districts owing to lack of cases to be heard by the Supreme Court in those districts.  

A summary of the work carried out by the Supreme Court of Tonga for the year ending 31 December 2011 is as follows:

From this figure, there were 312 total criminal cases filed in the reporting year, 169 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases 286 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  175 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 195 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 59%.

This figure is a comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 in the Supreme Court Criminal Jurisdiction

From this figure, there were 119 total civil cases filed in the reporting year, 268 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases 94 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  37 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 293 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 24%.

 

This figure is the comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 in the Supreme Court’s Civil Jurisdiction

From this figure, there were 165 total divorces cases filed in the reporting year, 79 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases 126 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  88 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 118 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 52%.

This figure is the comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 in the Supreme Court Divorce Jurisdiction.

From this figure, there were 25 total criminal appeal cases from the Magistrates filed in the reporting year, 8 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases 24 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  22 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 9 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 73%.

This figure is the comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 Criminal Appeal from the Magistrates Court to the Supreme Court.

From this figure, there were 9 total civil appeal cases from the Magistrates Court filed in the reporting year, 13 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases, 7 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  3 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 15 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 32%.

This figure is the comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 Civil Appeal from the Magistrates Court to the Supreme Court.

2.4     Land Court

All Land matters in 2011 were dealt with by the President of the Court, assisted, where required by the Land Act by one of the Land Court Assessors.  The Assessors for 2011 were Mr. George Blake, Mrs Lola Koloamatangi, Mrs Fuiva Kavaliku, Mr Sinilau Toumo’ua and Lord Fakatulolo.  All are for the district of Tongatapu.  This is the first year in which women have been appointed to the panel of Assessors.

 

The disposal rate for land cases continued to be low in comparison with other jurisdictions. The main reasons for this are first, the complexity of the cases, secondly the difficulty of  gathering the necessary evidence and thirdly the fact that in many cases the parties are related.  In such circumstances compromise is a highly desirable objective even though disposal delay is the inevitable consequence.  A review is being undertaken to ascertain how may of the long dormant pending cases have in fact been abandoned.

From this figure, there were 25 total land cases filed in the reporting year, 59 were cases pending from the previous years and of all those cases 15 of those cases were disposed of in the reporting year 2011.  4 were cases filed and disposed of in 2011 and we’re left with 69 cases still pending for the year 2012. The disposal rate of the reporting year was 18%.

This figure is the comparison of years 2009, 2010 and 2011 in the Land Court.

 

2.5     Probate & Administration

The applications for Probate and Letters of Administration saw an decrease in 2011. Most of these cases were finalized during the same year. The pending applications are mostly due to requirements being awaited or the cases have been abandoned.

2.5.1 Probate & Administration

YEAR

TOTAL FILINGS

CASES DISPOSED OF

PENDING CASES

DISPOSAL RATE IN PERCENTAGE

 

2011

31

29

2

93%

 

2010

37

28

9

75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5.2 Legitimation

YEAR

TOTAL FILINGS

PENDING

DISPOSED OF

DISPOSAL RATE IN PERCENTAGE

 

2011

28

6

22

75%

 

2010

30

9

21

70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5.3 Adoption & Legal Guardianship

Year

TOTAL FILINGS

DISPOSED OF

PENDING

DISPOSAL RATE IN PERCENTAGE

2009

150

108

42

72%

2010

134

55

79

41%

2011

142

81

61

57%

 

2.6     Registrar General’s Department

 

In 2011 there were less Registrar General applications filed than in previous years.  There were 759 applications all together and 87 remained pending at the end of the year.  These consisted of new applications lodged towards end of year, ‘abandoned’ applications and those awaiting further documents to be filed.

2.6.1 Lawyers Licences issued for 2011

YEAR

NO OF LICENCES ISSUED

SENIOR COUNSEL

FULLY QUALIFIED

LOCALLY QUALIFIED

UNQUALIFIED

 

2011 65 11 43 11 0

 

2010 71 10 53 17 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.6.2 2011 Nuku'alofa Marriage Statistics

YEAR

NO OF LICENCES ISSUED

NO OF LICENCES REVOKED

NO OF MARRIAGES IN 2011 RETURNED FOR REGISTRATION

NO OF MARRIAGE LICENCES STILL WITH CHURCH MINISTERS

 

2011

922

1

864

57

 

2010

881

Nil

840

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7     Staffing

There were only 2 Courts sitting in the Supreme Court and Land Court Jurisdictions for the entire 2011.  They were supported by 15 permanent staff members who were also responsible for Court of Appeal and Registrar General Department.

 

The introduction of 3 months maternity leave did have a noticeable impact on support staff in 2011.  This was compounded both by staff members being required to dispose of leave from the old system of leave entitlements and exchange of leave for unpaid overtime work particularly leave earned during Court of Appeal preparations.

 

 

3.       MAGISTRATES’ COURT’S REPORT

 

The Magistrates Court is headed by the Chief Magistrate, Mr. Sione Folau Lokotui assisted by two (2) Principal Magistrates, Mr Salesi Mafi and Mr. Paula Tatafu, two (2) recalled Magistrates, Mr. Petelo Soakimi and Mr. Masao Paasi and one (1) Relieving Magistrate / Acting Magistrate, Mr. Similoni Tu’akalau.

Mr. Paula Tatafu is the Magistrate for Vava’u. Ha’apai has no Magistrate since 2009, as their resident Magistrate, Mr. Vaha’ai Foliaki is away on scholarship studying for his Bachelor of Law (LLB) at Waikato University, New Zealand. There has been no replacement for Mr. Foliaki due to shortage of Magistrates.

Magistrate Court circuits to deal with cases in Ha’apai and ‘Eua are conducted every two months from January to December every year by visiting Magistrate from Nuku’alofa.

 

  

3.1     Tongatapu Court’s Report

 

Table 1            :           All Cases

Year

Total Cases

Total Disposed Cases

Pending

Disposal rate (%)

2011

14612

12322

2290

84.3%

Graph 1

There were 14612 total cases filed in the reporting year.  From this figure, 12322 were cases disposed of in the same year.  The disposal rate for cases filed in reporting year was 84.3%.

Graph 2

There were 4021 total criminal cases filed in the reporting year. 2249 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Criminal Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Tongatapu is 84%.

 

Table 3           :           Civil Cases

 

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Action Allowed

Action Declined

 

 

2011

390

276

237

0

32

55

43%

342

2010

180

367

42

0

100

15

28.7%

390

 

Graph 3

 

There were 276 total civil cases filed in the reporting year. 390 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Civil Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Tongatapu is 43%.

  

Table 4:          Traffic Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2011

2316

6725

4150

3

25

3343

83%

1520

2010

941

9930

3809

12

253

4481

78.7%

2316

 

There were 6725 total traffic cases filed in the reporting year. 2316 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Civil Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Tongatapu is 87% .

 

Graph 4

 

 

In 2011, there were a total of 14,162 new cases submitted to the Tongatapu Magistrate Court for execution 12322 cases disposed and 2290 case pending to 2012. The  clearance rate in the magistrate court is 84.3%. From 14,162 cases, 4021 are criminal cases, 216 civil cases and 6,725 are Traffic cases as shown by table 1,2,3 and 4.

 

Table 2 shows that 87% or 5447of the total 6270 criminal cases filed and pending during 2011 were executed.  Within the same category, 55.6% or 2822 out from a total of 5071 cases were executed during 2010.  With that figure, it shows that there was a slight increase in the number of cases disposed of during 2011, by 2625 cases, compared to 2010.  With civil cases as shows by table 3 and indicated by graph 3, there were a total of 276 cases submitted in 2011 together with a total of 390 pending cases from 2010.  Of all these cases, 324 cases were disposed of in 2011 and 342 cases pending to be executed during 2012.  Further, table 4 shows that there were 6,725 new traffic cases filed during 2011 plus 2,316 pending traffic cases from 2010.  Of these 9041 cases 83.2% were dealt with and 1,520 remain to be dealt with in 2012.

 

As shown by the graphs above there is an increase in the cases disposed of in 2011 as compared to that of 2010.  This is attributable to the fact that two retired Magistrates were brought out of retirement to assist the Court in the last quarter of 2010, Similoni Tu’akalau was appointed a relieving Magistrate and Salesi Mafi returned to duty after successfully completing his LLM.

 

3.2     Ha’apai Court’s Report

 

Table 1            :           Criminal Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2011

42

146

31

1

1

94

67.6%

61

2010

15

114

1

2

10

74

67.4%

42

 

There were 146 total criminal cases filed in the reporting year. 42 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Criminal Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Ha’apai is 67.6%.

Graph 1

 

Table 2           :           Civil Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Action Allowed

Action Declined

 

 

2011

2

4

2

 

 

1

50%

3

2010

Nil

9

3

 

 

4

77.8%

2

 

There were 4 total civil cases filed in the reporting year. 2 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Civil Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Ha’apai is 50%.

Graph 2

 

 

 

Table 3           :           Traffic Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2011

10

169

16

 

1

149

94.4%

3

2010

9

39

4

 

 

34

79.2%

10

 

There were 169 total traffic cases filed in the reporting year. 10 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Traffic Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Ha’apai is 92.3%.

 

Graph 3

 

 

Table 1 shows the number of criminal cases that were filed at the Ha’apai Magistrate Courts during 2011.  During 2011, there were a total of 319 new cases filed at the Ha’apai Magistrate Court of which 146 were criminal cases, 4 civil cases and 169 traffic cases.  Amongst those 188 criminal cases, there were 127 cases altogether or 67.6% of all cases which were able to be disposed of or be heard and 61 cases are pending to be heard in 2012. With the 4 civil cases filed in 2011 together with 2 cases pending from 2010, 50% or 3 cases were able to be disposed of during the year.  Lastly, there were 169 traffic cases filed in 2011 together with 10 cases pending from 2010.  With those 179 cases, 166 cases or 94.4% of all cases were able to be disposed of during the year.

As shown by the graphs above there is an increase in the cases disposed of in 2011 as compared to that of 2010.

 

3.3     Vava’u Court’s Report

 

Table 1       :           Criminal Cases

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2011

302

623

122

8

50

408

64%

337

2010

281

516

53

18

18

406

62.1%

302

 

Graph 1

 

There were 623 total criminal cases filed in the reporting year. 302 were cases from previous years. For 2011 the overall disposed rate for Criminal Cases (pending cases from 2010 plus new filing 2011) in Vava’u is 64%.

Table 2           :           Civil Cases

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Action Allowed

Action Declined

 

 

2011

147

67

16

 

11

29

29.0%

158

2010

131

75

25

 

 

34

28.6%

147

 

Graph 2

 

Table 3     :           Traffic Cases

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2011

 

1171

212

 

12

941

99%

6

2010

 

455

156

 

3

296

100%

 

 

Graph 3

 

 

Table 1 and table 2 indicated that the progress of execution of Court cases within the Vava’u Court is not as effective as that of the neighbouring island, Ha’apai.  In comparison, the average percentage of all cases that were disposed of within 2010 and 2011 at the Vava’u Court was 63.6% for Criminal and 28.7% for Civil.   The Ha’apai Court was 67.6% for criminal and 50% for civil cases.  This is just a comparison in terms of percentages but in reality, the number of cases filed within each jurisdiction is incomparable since there are more cases filed in the Vava’u Court than at the Ha’apai Court.

 

Table 3 indicates that the Vava’u Court addressed traffic cases as a priority, followed by criminal cases and civil cases.  Traffic cases as indicated by both table 3 and graph 3 have a 99% disposal rate, criminal cases an average of 64%, and civil cases a disposal rate of below 29%.  It is significant to note that civil cases form a very small percentage of cases filed in Vava’u.  The low rate of case disposal in Vava’u may be attributable to the shortage of staff in the Vava’u Court for the number of traffic, criminal and civil cases filed thereat.

 

3.4     ‘Eua Court’s Report

 

Table 1            :           Criminal Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2010

13

91

1

0

0

84

 

19

2011

19

150

18

41

5

87

 

18

 

Table 2 - Civil Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Action Declined

Action Declined

 

 

2010

2

1

0

0

1

0

 

2

2011

2

2

0

0

0

0

 

4

 

Table 3     :           Traffic Cases

 

Year

Pending from previous years

Total Filings

Cases Disposed Of

Disposal rate in %

Pending

 

 

 

Cases Withdrawal/Struck out

Committed to Supreme Court

Acquitted

Convicted

 

 

2010

2

204

1

 

1

178

 

26

2011

26

53

27

 

 

47

 

5

 

The above comparison has revealed different needs that require addressing at each of the Districts where the Magistrates Courts are situated.  These needs include (1) the need to increase the number of Magistrates to address the ever increasing number of cases brought to the Courts. There is currently no presiding Magistrate in Ha’apai and ‘Eua so the Tongatapu Magistrates’ Court has to provide Magistrates therefrom, to undertake circuits to Ha’apai and ‘Eua every 2 months.  When these circuits are held, court cases in Tongatapu have to be re-scheduled.    The Ministry during the last two to three years has continuously advertised the post of Magistrate, but only very few suitable applications are received.  The Ministry is part of a review committee to address (inter alia) the problems of recruiting Magistrates. 

 

During the year report, there were six Magistrates on post at the Tongatapu jurisdiction and that includes three permanent Magistrates, two relieving Magistrates and one acting Magistrate. On average each Magistrate has to deal with a total of 2,748 cases per year or 229 cases per month (using the 2010 figures).

Secondly, there is a need for further on-the-job-training as well as overseas trainings for the current Magistrates.  At present, there is one Magistrates currently on further study for his degree in Law at the Waikato University in New Zealand. Further, Magistrates need continuous on-the-job training and if necessary overseas training attachments to ensure that they are up-to-date with all new legal and judicial developments within the Judiciary.

 

3.5     Magistrates Annual Conference 2011

The Magistrates Annual Conference was not held during 2011.  The Lord Chief Justice had recommended that the Conference was re-scheduled to a time when the Court of Appeal was sitting in order that one of the Court of Appeal judges would be available to participate and lend his expertise to the Magistrates in their deliberations.  It was also noted that funding was required to provide a facilitator for the Judgment writing workshop and it was recommended that foreign aid be sought for this requirement.

 

3.6          Vital Statistic Office’s Statistics

 

REGISTRAR GENERAL BIRTHS 2011 (JANUARY 2011- DECEMBER 2011)

A. TONGAN

TONGATAPU

HAAPAI

VAVAU

‘EUA

NIUATOPUTAPU

NIUAFOOU

TOTAL

Total Registered

1977

91

343

42

3

3

2459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Legitimate

1709

79

315

36

3

3

2145

Male

948

32

159

22

2

2

1165

Female

761

47

156

14

1

1

980

(b) Illegitimate

268

12

28

6

 

 

314

Total

1977

91

343

42

3

3

2459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TONGATAPU

HAAPAI

VAVAU

‘EUA

NIUATOPUTAPU

NIUAFOOU

TOTAL

B.  NON TONGAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Registered

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

NB:  The total number of Non Tongan births is excluded from the number of births in Tongatapu

(a) Legitimate

23

 

 

 

 

 

23

Male

6

 

 

 

 

 

6

Female

17

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b) Illegitimate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

23

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEATHS 2011 (JANUARY—DECEMBER)

A.  TONGAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total registered

290

 

63

25

1

2

381

Births Exceeded Deaths by

1687

91

280

17

2

1

2078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MARRIAGES 2011 (JANUARY- DECEMBER)

A.  TONGAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total registered

850

 

143

32

6

 

1031

 

8.       Finance

The 2011/12 Financial Estimates was $2,699,000.00 for expenditure and a forecast of  revenue collection set at  $700,000.00 (for one Financial Year).   The total  of $2,200,603.00,  (82% of the budget) was for salary and salary related expenditure with  18%  assigned as operational expenditure.

 

The total revenue collection for January 11 – December 11 was $647,253.66.  (NB That the target revenue of TOP$700,000 is set for 30 June, 2012 (end of the Financial Government Year).  This indicates that the Ministry has achieved collection of more than half the revenue which was forecast for the Financial year within the first 6 months of the FY.

 

Details of the revenue collection for periods 01 January 2011 to 31 December 2011.

i.

Sales of Legal documents

$7,250.00

Ii

Court fees

$133,086.99

Iii

Fines and charges

$281,889.50

Iv

Registration fees

$190,393.90

 V

Marriage and divorce

$34,633.27

 

Total

$647,253.66

 

The sources of income for the Ministry are from Court Fees, Court Charges and Court Fines that are levied by the Judges and Magistrates on cases presented before them in Court plus Registration Fees.  Registration fees are revenue collected from charges on copies of birth, death and marriages certificates issued at the Vital Statistic Office.